Home News Stellar Blade vs \"Stellarblade\" Lawsuit Makes It More Confusing

Stellar Blade vs \"Stellarblade\" Lawsuit Makes It More Confusing

Jan 24,2025 Author: Chloe

Stellar Blade vs

A US film production company has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Sony and Shift Up, the creators of the popular PS5 game, Stellar Blade.

Trademark Dispute: Stellar Blade vs. Stellarblade

Stellar Blade vs

The Louisiana-based film company, "Stellarblade," claims that Sony and Shift Up's use of the similar name "Stellar Blade" constitutes trademark infringement. They argue this has negatively impacted their business, which specializes in commercials, documentaries, music videos, and independent films. The company alleges reduced online visibility due to the game's search engine dominance.

The lawsuit, filed earlier this month in a Louisiana court, seeks monetary damages, attorney fees, and an injunction to prevent further use of "Stellar Blade" or similar names. The plaintiff also demands the destruction of all Stellar Blade marketing materials.

Stellar Blade vs

The plaintiff, Griffith Chambers Mehaffey, registered the "Stellarblade" trademark in June 2023, following a cease and desist letter to Shift Up the previous month. He claims ownership of the stellarblade.com domain since 2006, actively using the name in his business since 2011. The lawsuit highlights the similarity between the logos and stylized "S," claiming they are confusingly similar.

Shift Up initially announced the game in 2019 under the working title "Project Eve," changing it to "Stellar Blade" in 2022 and registering the trademark in January 2023. Mehaffey's lawyer contends that Sony and Shift Up should have been aware of his pre-existing rights.

Stellar Blade vs

Mehaffey's lawyer stated to IGN that the defendants' actions have pushed their client's business into "digital obscurity," threatening their livelihood. They emphasize a belief in fair competition but highlight the need to protect their brand from larger companies disregarding established rights. The lawyer also points out that trademark rights can have retroactive application.

The case raises questions about the complexities of trademark law and the potential challenges faced by smaller businesses when competing with larger corporations.

LATEST ARTICLES

01

2026-10

Subway Surfers and Brawl Stars Launch a Simultaneous Crossover with Tons of New Content!

https://imgs.51tbt.com/uploads/33/68b9fe835fa35.webp

Two leading mobile gaming studios are teaming up. SYBO and Supercell have partnered to bring their hit titles, Subway Surfers and Brawl Stars, together in an unprecedented dual-game crossover event.How long does the Subway Surfers and Brawl Stars col

Author: ChloeReading:1

29

2026-09

Blood Strike launches brand-new collab with iconic anime series Neon Genesis Evangelion

https://imgs.51tbt.com/uploads/38/690a1525d48d1.webp

Neon Genesis Evangelion is arriving in the world of Blood StrikeTake on the strange extra-terrestrial(?) angels as they invadeGrab new cosmetics and weapons inspired by the seriesWhen it comes to anime, there are a few names that virtually everyone k

Author: ChloeReading:2

26

2026-09

Plants vs. Zombies Reboot: Legendary Game Remastered

https://imgs.51tbt.com/uploads/91/688bd96a97704.webp

Plants vs. Zombies is returning with a freshly remastered edition.PvZ: Replanted gives the original a vibrant HD makeover, packed with new content.Jump into local co-op and PvP battles, though a mobile release isn't confirmed just yet.Plants vs. Zomb

Author: ChloeReading:13

26

2026-09

INTERJECTION: \"used in an angry or annoyed way to show that something just said is already known or is obvious\" Crossword Clue - Try Hard Guides

https://imgs.51tbt.com/uploads/25/6a0c305381185.webp

We have identified the 3-letter solution for the INTERJECTION clue defined as "said with anger or annoyance to indicate that what was just mentioned is already clear or self-evident." This puzzle appeared in the Missing Letter Crossword edition dated

Author: ChloeReading:11